Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 Ark. 802 - Bachus v. Bachus

Bachus v. Bachus’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
5
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Lively v. Lively (1953), Seaton v. Seaton (1953)

2 federal appellate · 77 state decisions

1901950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pryor v. Pryor · McCue v. McCue · Beasley v. Haney · Rosewater v. Schwab Clothing Co. · Berlin v. Cantrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The parties to a divorce action may agree upon the alimony or maintenance to be paid. Although the court is not bound by the litigants’ contract, nevertheless if the court approves the settlement and awards support money upon that basis there is then no power to modify the decree at a later date.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as alimony and support for their four children.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.