In Re Immerfall’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2014
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 544
Relies on James Talcott, Inc. v. Franklin Nat. Bank of Mpls. · Stoecker Raleigh · Committee of Creditors Holding Unsecured Claims v. Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. (In Re Papercraft Corp.) · State Board of Equalization v. Los Angeles International Airport Hotel Associates (In Re Los Angeles International Airport Hotel Associates) · Matter of Lindell Drop Forge Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A proof of claim executed and filed in accordance with these rules shall constitute prima facie evidence of the validity and amount of the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Rowell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.