Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 BR 366 - In Re Taylor

In Re Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Butner v. United States · In re Whitaker · Carver v. Carver · Rexnord Holdings, Inc. v. Bidermann · Erti v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Q]uestions about whether the Automatic Stay stays an action or proceeding can be resolved either in the Bankruptcy Court or the state court where the case is pending. State courts retain jurisdiction to decide whether they have jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.