In Re Lippolis’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on Nantucket Investors II v. California Federal Bank · 17 493 71902 Roach · Sapos v. Provident Institution of Savings · Hammond v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. of America · In Re Ernest R Lilley Jr Ernest R Lilley Jr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“17. Transfer of the Property .... If all or any part of the Property or any interest in it is sold or transferred ... without Lender’s prior written consent, Lender may, at its option, require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument. However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender if exercise is prohibited by federal law as of the date of this Security Instrument. If Lender exercises this option, Lender shall give Borrower notice of acceleration. The notice shall provide a period of not less than 30 days from the date the notice is delivered or mailed within which Borrower must pay all sums secured by this Security Instrument. If Borrower fails to pay these sums prior to the expiration of this period, Lender may invoke any remedies permitted by this Security Instrument without further notice or demand on Borrower.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Allen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.