Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 CALAPP3D 1039 - People v. Brigham

People v. Brigham’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 31 Cal. App. 4th 1355 - People v. Olguin (1994), 59 Cal. 4th 155 - People v. Chiu (2014)

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

1901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nye & Nissen v. United States · Logan v. United States · Hyde v. United States · 10 Cal. 3d 703 - People v. Sedeno · Callanan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requires proof that the defendant and at least one other person specifically intended to agree or conspire to commit a crime, specifically intended to commit the crime, and carried out overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.