Maynard v. BTI Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 17 Cal. 4th 599 - Santisas v. Goodin · 9 Cal. 4th 863 - Chia-Lee Hsu v. Abbara · 20 Cal. 4th 1103 - Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc. · 3 Cal. App. 4th 1338 - Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. · 13 Cal. App. 4th 949 - Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ection 1032, subdivision (b) provides that '[e]xcept as otherwise expressly provided by statute, a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding' and [Code of Civil Procedure] section 1033.5, subdivision (a)(10)(A) provides that allowable costs include attorney fees 'when authorized by ... [¶] ... Contract.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Like provisions referring to any claim 'in connection with' a particular agreement, or to any action 'arising out of' an agreement , an attorney fee provision awarding fees based on the outcome of 'any dispute' encompasses all claims, whether in contract, tort or otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“For example, a party who is denied direct relief on a claim may nonetheless be found to be a prevailing party if it is clear that the party has otherwise achieved its main litigation objective.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.