Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

216 Conn. 801

State v. Osman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 11, 1990

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1990-07-11

Relies on 21 Conn. App. 299 - State v. Osman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-07-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2025

3 state decisions

101990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 299, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“ 1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence adduced at trial to prove identification was sufficient to sustain, logically and beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury’s guilty verdict on first degree robbery and conspiracy to commit first degree robbery?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that evidence of a coparticipant’s use or threatened use of a tire iron was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction of conspiracy to commit first degree robbery, in violation of C.G.S. §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (3), where that theory of liability was neither charged in the information nor instructed upon at trial?”
/216/conn/801 · .json · Public domain