Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

216 Conn. 821

Argentinis v. Gould

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 4, 1990

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1990-10-04

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2000

5 state decisions

Relies on Argentinis v. Gould · Edens v. Kole Construction Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-10-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Paul L. Gould and Paul L. Gould et al.’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 9, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly enter judgment affirming the trial court’s decision that the plaintiff in the matter captioned Takis Argentinis v. Paul L. Gould et al. was entitled to compensatory damages in his suit for breach of construction contract and that the defendants in the matter captioned Paul L. Gould v. P.A. Argentinis et al. were also entitled to judgment in the foreclosure action?
“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in finding justification for its judgment in Edens v. Kole Construction Co., 188 Conn. 489?”
/216/conn/821 · .json · Public domain