Liebing v. Matthews’s Empirical Analysis
216 F. 1 · 1914
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2002
5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. Barney · Arkansas Val Land Cattle Co v. Mann · Liverpool Steam Co v. Insurance Co of North America · Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Waterworks Co. · Gormley v. Bunyan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Bearing tbis in mind, it bas been so long settled that the ruling on a motion for a new trial cannot be reviewed in an appellate court as to scarcely require the citation of authorities.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fruth v. Benassi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.