Deupree v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
216 F. 483 · 1914
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1938
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on York Manufacturing Company v. Arthur Cassell J B · Holt v. Henley · Holt v. Crucible Steel Company of America · Ohio Valley Bank Co. v. Mack · Crucible Steel Co. of America v. Holt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The trustee takes nothing, as to any of his claims, by the amendment of 1910, and since Mrs. Watson’s mortgage was effective against unsecured subsequent creditors without notice who had not fastened a lien upon the property, and by recording became ‘valid’ under the Kentucky statute, the attachments subsequent to the date of record are futilities.” In re Doran, 154 Fed. 467 , 83 C. C. A. 265 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““And such trustees, as to all property in the custody or coming into the custody of the bankruptcy court, shall be deemed, vested with all the rights, remedies and powers of a creditor holding a lien by legal or equitable proceedings thereon.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.