Gray v. Dukedom Bank’s Empirical Analysis
216 F.2d 108 · 1954
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2002 · most notably Hoffman v. Celebrezze (1969), Scola v. Boat Frances, R., Inc. (1980)
31 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co. · United States v. Alcea Band · National Bank v. Insurance Co. · Tillson v. United States · Goldreyer v. Cronan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In other words, in the absence of constitutional requirements, interest can be recovered against the United States only if express consent to such a recovery has been given by Congress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.