Guy Edmond Weir v. Jerome J. Gordon

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Oct. 6, 1954.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1954-10-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co. · Gordon v. Weir

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1954-10-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 1987

14 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Martin & Martin, Saginaw, Mich., for appellant.

Gregory S. Dolgorukov. Detroit, Mich., Dugald S. McDougall, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

In this action for copyright infringement the district court, 111 F.Supp. 117, found that the appellant made copies of the principal features of the appellee's copyrighted advertising material, and caused the same to be published for his own profit. We find that the district court's controlling findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that the court correctly applied the law. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co., 8 Cir., 1932, 61 F.2d 131. It follows that the judgment of the district court should be and it hereby is affirmed.