Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 F.2d 880 - Max H. Katz and Ida Katz v. Herman E. Ross

Max H. Katz and Ida Katz v. Herman E. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

216 F.2d 880 · 1954

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
6
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1994

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

3019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ake v. Birnbaum · Peery v. Mershon · McDougald v. Couey · Newman v. Stocker · Yokom v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The insurance company's] liability to the defendant on a policy of insurance is not being adjudicated in the suit; the only adjudication possible is that upon the liability of the present defendant to the present plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.