D&f v. F’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · National Labor Relations Board v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An object to be considered for adverse aeronautical effect must first exceed the obstruction standards of Subpart C ... and/or be found to have physical or electromagnetic radiation effect on the operation of air navigation facilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“). Upon the study's conclusion, the Regional Manager issues a hazard/no-hazard determination. See 14 C.F.R. § 77.35 (c). In order to issue a hazard determination, the Regional Manager”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he requirement that agency action not be arbitrary and capricious includes a requirement that the agency adequately explain its result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.