Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 F.3d 1328 - Cotton v. Jackson

Cotton v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

216 F.3d 1328 · 2000

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
5
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Zinermon v. Burch · Wilson v. Layne · United States v. Gates · Alexander v. Fulton County · Jackson v. City of Columbus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he state must have the opportunity to remedy the procedural failings of its subdivisions and agencies in the appropriate fora - agencies, review boards, and state courts [-] before being subjected to a claim alleging a procedural due process violation.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “certiorari [to the state courts] is generally an adequate state remedy”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]hen reputational damage is sustained in connection with a termination of [government] employment, it may give rise to a procedural due process claim for deprivation of liberty which is actionable under section 1983.”); Cannon, 250 F.3d at 1303 C'[I]n this circuit a 'discharge [from employment] or more' is required in order to satisfy the 'plus’ element of the stigma-plus test.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.