← 216 F.3d 707 - Buettner v. Arch Coal Sales Co.

Buettner v. Arch Coal Sales Co.’s Empirical Analysis

216 F.3d 707 · 2000

Citation profile

125

cited by 125 later decisions

states following

June 2020

most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 13 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Sprenger v. Federal Home Loan Bank (2001), Robertson v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. (2004)

50 federal appellate · 13 district · 8 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Corning Glass Works v. Brennan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[a] plaintiff need not establish the conduct which she opposed was in fact discriminatory but rather must demonstrate a good faith, reasonable belief that the underlying challenged conduct violated the law,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America, LLC · 374 F. Supp. 2d 787 - Reed v. Rolla 31 Public School Dist.
“make a sufficient showing on every essential element of its claim on which it bears the burden of proof.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 503 F. Supp. 2d 1217 - Staple Cotton Co-Op. Assoc. v. Dg and G., Inc. · 374 F. Supp. 2d 787 - Reed v. Rolla 31 Public School Dist.
“(1) [Kirchhoff] engaged in activity protected by Title VII; (2) an adverse employment action occurred; and (3) a causal connection between participation in the protected activity and the adverse employment action.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 285 F. Supp. 2d 1146 - Soto v. John Morrell & Co. · 302 F. Supp. 2d 1041 - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyeth

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.