Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 FSUPP2D 262 - Chiminya Tachiona v. Mugabe

Chiminya Tachiona v. Mugabe’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 2009
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Lauritzen v. Larsen · Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Sabbatino · Hobson v. Wilson · Filartiga v. Pena-Irala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “MDC supporters were constantly harassed, peaceful assemblies were interrupted by mobs of ZANU-PF supporters attacking MDC supporters, assassination attempts were made on MDC candidates, and MDC supporters were killed. 88”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “). 4 . See Tachiona v. Mugabe, 216 F.Supp.2d 262 (S.D.N.Y.2002) {”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.