Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 FSUPP3D 1017 - Robb v. Fitbit Inc.

Robb v. Fitbit Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77 · 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77O (§ 15 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo · Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the stock drop was due to other factors is a factual inquiry better suited for determination on summary judgment or trial, rather than at the pleading stage.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[S]tatements that merely express confidence in a company's business and outlook are vague assertions of corporate optimism and are not actionable under federal securities laws.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.