Action NC v. Strach’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 517 · 52 U.S.C. § 20501 · 52 U.S.C. § 20503 · 52 U.S.C. § 20504 · 52 U.S.C. § 20506 · 52 U.S.C. § 20509 · 52 U.S.C. § 20510 · 52 U.S.C. § 21082
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Ex Parte: Edward T Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... for purposes of a State motor vehicle driver's license shall serve as notification of change of address for voter registration ... unless the registrant states on the form that the change of address is not for voter registration purposes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a defendant's practices have hampered an organization's stated objectives causing the organization to divert its resources as a result.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[the] words 'each' and 'any' as used in NVRA provision requiring that each state motor vehicle driver's license application serve as application for voter registration and that any change of address form submitted shall serve as notification of change of address for voter registration were unambiguous and reflected Congress' intent to make the NVRA applicable to 'each' and 'every' covered transaction, irrespective of whether the transaction occurred remotely or in person”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stringer v. Pablos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.