Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 Ga. App. 887 - Restaura, Inc. v. Singleton

216 Ga. App. 887 - Restaura, Inc. v. Singleton’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 160 Ga. App. 116 - North v. Toco Hills, Inc. · 166 Ga. App. 349 - Atkins v. Tri-Cities Steel, Inc. · 179 Ga. App. 635 - Armstrong v. Sundance Entertainment, Inc. · 210 Ga. App. 316 - Stanfield v. Kime Plus, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o determine whether a person is an invitee or a mere licensee, the nature of his relation or contact with the owner or occupier of the premises must be determined. The test is whether the injured person at the time of the injury had present business relations with the owner of the premises which would render his presence of mutual aid to both, or whether his presence on the premises was for his own convenience.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.