Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 ILLAPP 554 - Shirk v. County Board

Shirk v. County Board’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1952
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co. · Farmers & Mechanics Life Ass'n v. Caine · East v. Crow · Kelley, Maus & Co. v. Caffrey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The demands by the appellee were not unliquidated. It was only a matter of computation to determine the total amount due with each report. . . . “Under these authorities it appears the demands of the appellee were not for unliquidated damages and that the acceptance of a less sum than the amount actually due only satisfied a portion of each demand equal to the amount received. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.