Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 Ind. 508 - Wilkins v. Leeds

Wilkins v. Leeds’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2006

7 state decisions

201940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gerhardt · Storen, State Treas. v. Sexton, Marion Co. Treas.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But to determine whether an agency serving the public is a ‘public utility’, recourse must be had to section 1 of the act, in which the terms used throughout the act are defined. By the amendment to section 1, the term ‘public utility’ was redefined so as to exclude municipally-owned plants. The section is unchanged and still applies to every ‘public utility’, but a municipally-owned plant is no longer a ‘public utility’ within the meaning of the act.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.