Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 Kan. 692 - State v. Ralls

State v. Ralls’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2009

12 state decisions

801975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Osburn · State v. Trotter · State v. Harden · State v. Williamson · Portis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The determination of whether a statement is freely and voluntarily given must be based upon a consideration of the totality of the circumstances. Where there is a genuine conflict in the evidence, an appellate court must place great reliance upon the findings of the trial court. If the trial court’s findings are based upon competent evidence, they will not be disturbed on appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.