Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 Kan. 788 - Muse v. Baker

Muse v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 2000
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Union National Bank & Trust Co. v. Acker · Wehking v. Wehking · Phillip Van Heusen, Inc. v. Korn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person may estop himself from denying his liability as a partner, where such relationship does not exist in fact, by holding himself out as such, or where his course of conduct and representations leads another to believe he is a partner, and the party misled extends credit in reliance thereon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.