Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 La. 295 - Moss v. Robinson

Moss v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 1993 · most notably Bernard Brothers v. Dugas (1956), Cooper v. Succession of Cooper (1958)

37 state decisions

190194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Succession of Coste · Gulf Lumber Co. v. Bender · Succession of Galiano · Martin v. Donovan · Mossop V. His Creditors

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * when a plaintiff introduces in evidence the negotiable instrument sued on -(legally presumed to have been given for Value received) he is not required in the first instance to produce any further proof of consideration, notwithstanding that the defendant has specifically pleaded a want thereof. The defendant, thereupon, has the burden of going forward with the evidence and rebutting the prima facie case (in favor of plaintiff) thus made out. * * * But if the defendant offers evidence which overcomes the prima facie case, that is, casts doubt upon the reality of tlie consideration, the ultimate burden of proving consideration, by evidence that preponderates, is on the plaintiff ‡ 'Jf. sj? »”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.