Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

216 N.C. 543

5 S.E.2d 719

State v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 29, 1939

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1939-11-29

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1939-11-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 1976

5 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

7019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stacy, C. J.

¶1 At tbe July Term, 1939, Pender Superior Court, tbe defendant herein, Jim Moore, was tried upon indictment charging him with tbe murder of one John Robert Fennell, alias John Robert Findle, alias John Robert Mims, which resulted in a conviction of “First Degree *544 Murder as charged in tbe bill of indictment,” and sentence of death as the law commands upon such verdict.

¶2 From the judgment thus entered, the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court and was allowed 40 days from 20 July, 1939, to make up and serve his statement of case on appeal, and the solicitor was given the “same period of time to serve countercase.” The clerk certifies that the “appeal was not perfected within the time allowed by the Court, nor fourteen days before the call of the district.”

¶3 The time for serving statement of case on appeal has expired. S. v. Watson, 208 N. C., 70, 179 S. E., 455. No bond was required as the defendant was allowed to appeal in forma pauperis, albeit the order to this effect seems to have been made without supporting affidavit as required by C. S., 4651. S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.

¶4 In the absence of any apparent error, which the record now before us fails to disclose, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss under Rule 17 will be allowed.

¶5 The defendant’s application for certiorari must be denied on authority of S. v. Moore, 210 N. C., 686, 188 S. E., 421. He applied to the solicitor for an extension of time before it expired, but this was not granted. Certiorari would not help him in the circumstances. Smith v. Smith, 199 N. C., 463, 154 S. E., 737.

¶6 Certiorari denied.

¶7 Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.

/216/nc/543 · .json · Public domain