216 N.C. App. 337 - State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"[If] evidence is admitted for a purpose other than the truth of the matter asserted," such as when evidence is admitted solely for purposes of corroboration, then "the protection afforded by the Confrontation Clause against testimonial statements is not at issue." ... According to our Supreme Court, North Carolina case law establishes "the rule that prior consistent statements are admissible even though they contain new or additional information so long as the narration of events is substantially similar to the witness' in-court testimony."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 250 N.C. App. 158 - State v. Thompson

2. “[I]t is well established in our jurisprudence "that no appeal lies from one Superior Court judge to another; that one Superior Court judge may not correct another's errors of law; and that ordinarily one judge may not modify, overrule, or change the judgment of another Superior Court judge previously made in the same action."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Reeger

3. “the protection afforded by the Confrontation Clause against testimonial statements is not at issue.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 250 N.C. App. 158 - State v. Thompson