216 N.C. App. 436 - State v. Barrow’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Price v. Georgia · Hopper v. Evans · Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd. · State v. Wilkerson · International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 406 v. Guidry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he trial court has the burden of declaring and explaining the law arising on evidence as it relates to each substantial feature of the case. Because N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.16(d) limits what evidence the jury can consider in deciding whether an aggravating factor exists, the trial court was required to instruct the jury in accordance with the statute-as the pattern jury instruction specifies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Adams“that such error was likely, in light of the entire charge, to mislead the jury. Further, [this Court] must determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that had the instruction been given, the jury would have failed to find the existence of the aggravating factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.