216 N.C. App. 540 - Bell v. Mozley’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Koufman v. Koufman · 138 N.C. App. 612 - Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co. · 133 N.C. App. 139 - Replacements, Ltd. v. Midwesterling · 99 N.C. App. 626 - Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review of an order determining personal jurisdiction is whether the findings of fact by the trial court are supported by competent evidence in the record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The determination of whether the trial court can properly exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant is a two-part inquiry. First, the North Carolina long-arm statute must permit the exercise of personal jurisdiction. Second, the exercise of personal jurisdiction must comport with the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In order to determine whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction comports with due process, the trial court must evaluate whether the defendant has certain minimum contacts with the forum state such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.