Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 Neb. 523 - Spulak v. Estep

Spulak v. Estep’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Erspamer Advertising Co. v. Department of Labor · Stephens v. Celeryvale Transport, Inc. · Bohy v. PFISTER HYBRID COMPANY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here a written contract between the claimant and alleged employer exists, which not only denominates the relationship as that of independent contractor but also describes that kind of relationship, and nothing in the manner of performance by the parties is inconsistent with the relationship described, then the independent contractor is, as a matter of law, bound by the contract and is not to be deemed an employee within the meaning of the workmen’s compensation statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.