216 N.Y. 682
110 N.E 1045
Decided November 16, 1915
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1915-11-16
CROSS-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 1Y, 1913, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee, in an action for an accounting, so as to provide that the referee’s fees and the entire amount of the stenographer’s fees upon the accounting as fixed by the court at Special Term shall be paid by defendants out of the funds found to be…
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1915-11-16
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1967
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment modified so as to leave the judgment of the Special Term undisturbed as to costs incurred up to and including the rendition of the interlocutory judgment, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff in this court, and case remitted to the Supreme Court to *683 enter judgment on the taxation of costs in accordance with this decision; no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Hiscock, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, J J. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.