People v. Tolbert’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sanders v. United States · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. · United States v. Henry · Martin v. People · People v. Dunlap
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A sentence that is not in full compliance with the sentencing statutes is illegal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“once a court has decided an issue necessary to its judgment, the decision will preclude relitigation of that issue in a later action involving a party to the first case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“raised and resolved in a prior postconviction proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Jenkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.