State v. Hager’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Doe v. United States · 105 Wash. 2d 692 - State v. Kwan Fai Mak · State v. Easter · 124 Wash. 2d 57 - State v. Johnson · State v. Warren
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a criminal proceeding, a new trial is necessary only when the defendant `has been so prejudiced that nothing short of a new trial can insure that the defendant will be treated fairly.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hager“You can state the demeanor. You can't say because of that I think he was deceptive or evasive. The jury is to make that conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hager“What was Mr. Hager's demeanor like during the time that you had contact with him that day,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hager
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.