Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 So. 2d 780 - Thomas v. State

216 So. 2d 780 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1978
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crum v. State · 156 So. 2d 677 - Sharon v. State · 211 So. 2d 862 - Simpson v. State · Walker v. State · Sobol v. Sobol

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * In order to convict a person under § 811.021, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., it it not necessary that the elements of common law larceny be proven, nor need it be shown that the property was obtained through fraud or false pretenses. It is enough to prove that the defendant `* * * secretes, withholds or appropriates to his own use, or that of any other person other than the true owner * * * the property in question.' § 811.021(1) (a), Fla. Stat., F.S.A.; Gaynor v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 196 So.2d 19 ; Hunt v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 200 So.2d 212 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.