Martinez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 848 So. 2d 287 - State v. McBride · 500 So. 2d 501 - Williams v. State · 969 So. 2d 238 - Brooks v. State · Wilhelm v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder the CPC, given the total sentencing points, the trial court was required, absent a valid reason for departure, to sentence the defendant to the [LPS] for each crime”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Champagne v. State“[o]nly the State's agreement to cap [the offender's] sentence ... enabled the trial court to depart from imposing the [LPS] for both counts”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Champagne v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.