Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 U.S. 439 - Toxaway Hotel Co. v. Smathers & Co.

Toxaway Hotel Co. v. Smathers & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

216 U.S. 439 · 1910

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
July 1939
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 9 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1939 · most notably Lee v. the Cloverleaf, Inc. (1937), Item Co. v. National Dyers & Cleaners, Ltd. (1930)

13 federal appellate · 9 district · 16 state decisions

170191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedWulbern v. Drake (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on In re First Nat. Bank of Belle Fourche · Alberto Armstrong v. Eduardo Fernandez · In re New York & W. Water Co. · Friday v. Hall & Kaul Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It may have been engaged in doing two distinct kinds of business. But unless this corporation was ‘engaged principally’ in mercantile pursuits' it was not amenable to the act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.