Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 216 Va. 645 - Bly v. Rhoads

Bly v. Rhoads’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
13
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Sard v. Hardy (1977), Harnish v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (1982)

12 federal appellate · 78 state decisions — followed in 13 states

44019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Phelps Dodge Corp. v. AFL-CIO Joint Negotiating Committee · 8 Cal. 3d 229 - Cobbs v. Grant · Canterbury v. Spence · Wilkinson v. Vesey · 58 Wis. 2d 569 - Trogun v. Fruchtman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Virginia, at least since 1918, when we decided Hunter v. Burroughs, supra, 123 Va. at 131, 96 S.E. at 366, the standard of due medical care applicable to specialists has been that of ‘other like specialists in good standing, in the same or similar localities as defendant.’ We reiterated this rule in Fox v. Mason, 139 Va. 667, 671 , 124 S.E. 405, 406 (1924), where we set out the ‘same or similar community’ standard applicable to physicians and surgeons and then said, ‘[t]he rule is the same as to specialists’” (footnote omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The matters involved in the disclosure syndrome, more often than not, are complicated and highly technical. To leave the establishment of such matters to lay witnesses, in our opinion, would pose dangers and disadvantages which far outweigh the benefits and advantages a ‘modern trend’ rule would bestow on patient-plaintiffs. In effect, the relaxed ‘modern trend’ rule permits lay witnesses to express, when all is said and done, what amounts to a medical opinion. 216 Va. at 650 , 222 S.E.2d at 787 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.