216 Wis. 2d 166 - State v. Kevin L. C.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Morissette v. United States · Miller v. California · Idaho v. Wright · Ginsberg v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because § 948.11(2)(a), STATS., criminalizes acts where an individual personally confronts, or has the opportunity to personally confront, a specific child, thereby allowing the individual to easily ascertain the child's age, we conclude the statute does not create an unreasonable burden on the individual's First Amendment rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“reasonably imposes upon an individual the obligation to ascertain the age of persons to whom he or she wishes to exhibit materials deemed harmful to children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Weidner“the perpetrator confronts the underage victim personally and may reasonably be required to ascertain that victim's age.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Trochinski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.