216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
255 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 263 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably 2009 WI App 62 - Industrial Risk Insurers & Quad Graphics, Inc. v. American Engineering Testing, Inc. (2009), State v. Davidson (2000)
255 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 107 Wis. 2d 400 - Loy v. Bunderson · 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 263 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appellate court will sustain an evidentiary ruling if it finds that the circuit court examined the relevant facts; applied a proper standard of law; and using a demonstrative rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.”
75 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Conner · Jw v. Bb“Unfair prejudice results when the proffered evidence has a tendency to influence the outcome by improper means or if it appeals to the jury's sympathies, arouses its sense of horror, provokes its instinct to punish or otherwise causes a jury to base its decision on something other than the established propositions in the case.”
19 later decisions quote this exact passage“evidence to show a similarity between the other act and the charged offense. Rather, the State sought to introduce the solicitation evidence to show Bauer's critical awareness, interest and concern about his guilt to the very charge before the jury. When the State or the defense offers a”
12 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bauer · State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.