216 W. Va. 231 - Pullin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sandstrom v. Montana · 194 W. Va. 657 - State v. Guthrie · 194 W. Va. 3 - State v. Miller · United States v. Tarantino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The other assignments of error asserted by Mr. Pullin have no merit, and we therefore summarily reject them. We will note, however, as to the issue of sufficiency of evidence, we find that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions. . . . Consequently, there is no bar to retrying Mr. Pullin.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The right to a presumption of innocence is so firmly embedded in our law, ... that a violation of that right would result in such unfairness as to constitute a deprivation of one's right to due process of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n the trial of a criminal offense, the presumption of innocence existing in favor of a defendant continues through every stage of the trial until a finding of guilty by the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.