State v. Cashman’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 1996
1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 25 Conn. Super. Ct. 148 - Zavras v. Beth David Synagogue · National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 901
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * that the word “threat” connotes “menace,” that “the circumstances under which the threat is uttered and the relations between the parties may be taken into consideration” and that “[t]he threat must also be such as would ordinarily create alarm.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t is necessary only that the threats impart the expectation of bodily harm or death, thereby inducing fear and apprehension in the person threatened”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.