Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

217 A.D. 724

Apfel v. Auditore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1926-06-15

Decided 1926-06-15

Per Curiam.

¶1Since the plaintiff’s cause of action is to recover upon an unliquidated claim, it does not come within the provision of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The granting of the motion for summary judgment was, *725therefore, unauthorized. The judgment and orders appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Wagner, JJ. Judgment and orders reversed, wi1h costs, and motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs.

/217/ad/724 · .json · Public domain