State v. Soria’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Henderson · Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc. · State v. Munninger · Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners · Medley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Both bench warrants were quashed, but neither fee was vacated, and there is no evidence in the record regarding whether Ayonayon paid either fee. Thus, it is unclear which bench warrant fee the superior court affirmed at sentencing. However, regardless of which bench warrant fee was affirmed at sentencing, we find no error. ¶ 5 Maricopa County Superior Court Administrative Order No. 2004-199 authorizes a court to impose a $45”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ayonayon“In addition to any other county power or authority the board of supervisors may adopt fee schedules for any specific products and services the county provides to the public. Notwithstanding fee schedules or individual charges in statute, a board of supervisors may adopt an additional charge or separate individual charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ayonayon“on defendants whose arrest is commanded by a bench warrant for, 1) their failure to appear in court as required; or 2) their failure to pay outstanding fines and fees....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ayonayon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.