Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 Ark. 810 - Sims v. McFadden

Sims v. McFadden’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

2 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2012 · most notably Meyer v. United States (1963), Alston v. Bitely (1972)

2 district · 16 state decisions

601950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nolan v. Nolan · Simpson v. Biffle · Sidway v. Lawson · Stewart v. Pritchard · Kerens National Bank v. Stockton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This decree would ordinarily be a proper marshaling of the assets, since the general rule is to require a secured creditor to proceed first against that part of his security that the common creditors cannot reach. But when a homestead is involved there is a well recognized exception to this rule. One whose homestead is mortgaged along with other property is entitled to demand that that mortgagee proceed first against the other property. Bank of Hoxie v. Graham, 184 Ark. 1065 , 44 S.W.2d 1099 . In this situation a common creditor cannot invoke the ordinary rule that requires the secured creditor to look first to that part of his security that the other creditors cannot reach. Bank of Luverne v. Turk, 222 Ala. 549 , 133 So. 52 ; Mounce v. Wightman, 29 Ariz. 567 , 243 P. 415 . The law is so solicitous of the homestead right that the secured creditor will be required to exhaust his non-exempt security first, even though this procedure entails a loss to the common creditors. Nolan v. Nolan, 155 Cal. 476 , 101 P. 520 ; Kerens Nat. Bank v. Stockton, 120 Tex. 546 , 40 S.W.2d 7 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.