Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 ARK 899 - Whetstone v. Daniel

Whetstone v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2004

8 state decisions

40195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Slayton v. Russ

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““*###that notice [written] is a necessary element in the legislative scheme. It gives the recipient unmistakeable warning that the attorney is insisting upon his lien and that any subsequent compromise will involve liability for the attorney’s compensation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.