Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 BR 654 - In Re Bennett

In Re Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on 612 So. 2d 572 - In Re McCollam · In Re Pizzi · In Re Benedict · Solomon Guardian Life Insurance Company v. Solomon · In Re Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court will not resort to conjecture regarding Debtor’s future payee status for purposes of determining whether the annuity proceeds are exempt. Rather, the Court examines the facts presently before it, and those facts establish that Debtor is currently the payee under the terms of the annuity contract. Therefore, the annuity proceeds are exempt from the property of the bankruptcy estate pursuant to § 222.14.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.