Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 Cal. 400 - In Re Herron

In Re Herron’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably In Re Phillips (1941), In Re Lavine (1935)

44 state decisions

160193319401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 18 Cal. App. 166 - In Re Giannini · 121 Cal. App. 711 - In Re Young · Ex Parte Slattery · In Re Suspension of Jacobsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every defendant who has fulfilled the conditions of his probation for the entire period thereof ... shall ... be permitted by the court to withdraw his plea of guilty and enter a plea of not guilty; or if he has been convicted after a plea of not guilty, the court shall set aside the verdict of guilty; and in either case the court shall thereupon dismiss the accusation or information against such defendant, who shall thereafter be released from all penalties and disabilities resulting from the offense or crime of which he has been convicted ... provided, that in any subsequent prosecution of such defendant for any other offense such prior conviction may be pleaded and proved and shall have the same effect as if probation had not been granted or the accusation or information dismissed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if the conviction has become final and has not been set aside, this court, under sections 287 and 299 of the Code of Civil Procedure has no election, but must disbar respondent”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.