Semore v. Pool’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably McGonigle v. Combs (1992), 24 Cal. 4th 800 - CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. Fund (2001)
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · 57 Cal. 2d 450 - Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court · Frye v. United States · National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab · O'CONNOR v. Ortega
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Plaintiff contends that [Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection Dist, supra, 43 Cal.3d 148 ] is inapplicable because he did not allege a physical injury .... Defendants reply that all injuries stemming from termination fall under the exclusive remedy provisions of the workers’ compensation statutes. . . . [f] This court has previously held that the proper test is whether the acts alleged were part of the normal employment relationship. [Citing Hart] . . . Applying this test here, we find that the acts complained of were clearly a normal part of the work relationship, and the exclusive remedy provisions of the workers’ compensation law apply. (Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection Dist, supra, 43 Cal.3d at pp. 160-161.)” (Semore v. Pool, supra, 217 Cal.App.3d at p. 1104 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`An employer's supervisory conduct is inherently”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.