Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 217 CONN 24 - Dunham v. Dunham

Dunham v. Dunham’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Santopietro v. City of New Haven (1996), Tomasso Bros. v. October Twenty-Four, Inc. (1994)

58 state decisions

430199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · V Subversive Activities Control Board · Garner v. United States · State v. Curcio · Dunham v. Dunham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] notice of lis pendens ensures that the [litigant's] claim cannot be defeated by a prejudgment transfer of the property . . . [T]he lis pendens procedure provides security for payment of the claim pending final resolution of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Upon the hearing held on [the motion to dissolve the notice of lis pendens], the plaintiff shall first be required to establish that there is probable cause to sustain the validity of his claim. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “not self-executing [and] must be expressly invoked at the time that allegedly incriminatory evidence is sought to be compelled or introduced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.