Thompson v. Duehay’s Empirical Analysis
217 F. 484 · 1914
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1977
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte Garland · United States v. George Wilson · Ex Parte: in the Matter of William Wells on a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That nothing herein contained shall be construed to impair the power of the President of the United States to grant a pardon or commutation in any case, or in any way impair or revoke such good time allowance as is or may hereafter be provided by act of Congress.” Act June 25, 1910, c. 387, 36 Stat. 819 , Fed. Stat. Ann. (Supp. 1912) p. 306 (Comp. St. 1913, §§ 10535-10544).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duehay v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.